Topic
Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic:
Leaders and directors in an organisation are normally elder people. Some people think younger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree?
You should write at least 250 words.
Use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence. 
Answer
It is said that leaders and directors in an organisation are normally elder people.
However, in modern society, it is no longer unusual that one becomes leader at
his very young age. As far as I am concern, young leaders can definitely do their
job as good as, or even better than the elders.
First
of all, young leaders are often highly educated, highly skilled and
open-minded. Definitely we could not judge a person’s ability based on his qualifications
only but somehow these things display a huge part of his quality. Moreover, the
youngsters would be willing to change or adapt to fit in the modern conditions while
elder people are sometimes rigid with their antiquated attitude. Besides,
younger leaders tend to be more ambitious and active than the older ones.
Because they just start to build their career, they would be more likely to
contribute and have a lot of plans in their mind to develop their career and
the organisation.
Certainly
in comparison to elder people, young leaders appear to be lack of experience,
immature and even risky. However, sometimes, dare to take the risk is the key
factor to succeed. There are many people who have the same qualifications and
skills but not every one could dare to take the risk.
Although
it is doubtful that young leaders would be completely better than older ones,
how nice it would be to give those youngsters the chances to prove themselves
and blow a new air into an organisation.
(248 words)
No comments:
Post a Comment